So it’s ok for the device not to detect motion, and trip lights? Or to detect it late?
If you read back through this sub-forum, you’ll see a long history of the issues people have had with the battery powered Z-Wave based Motion devices. Some of the newer ones may be better, but the likes of the HSM-100’s (Gen1,2,3), ACT HomePOS (etc) have a long history of problems. I have a couple of these in a box in the garage as a result of their poor overall performance.
They often improve a little by being mains powered, but you’re still left with a small # of options.
Once you start wanting to get closer to presence-detection, you need detectors that are fast, have a wide sensitivity range (etc) in order to improve the speed at which lights (etc) come on.
There’s nothing worse than walking into a dark room 30% of the time because a device failed to detect, or detect & act, quickly.
I suspect this is all part of the reliability that Richard is referring to, and it’s why a number of us have integrated our Alarm systems - to give us choice over a wide range of available sensors, and ability to choose the ones with the specific characteristics we need (accuracy, false-detection, spread, size, placement, internal-external etc).
For smaller, powered, deployments you can also use the contact-sensor method in order to give yourself some choice. This gives you the advantage of access to a wide array of reliable motion detectors, in various shapes and sizes, without having to start out with a full-blown Alarm integration.
Out of interest, what make/model is the Alarm system?