When you execute the html for getting the status of the zwave devices (e.g. http://192.168.1.50:3451/data_request?id=zwave_status), you get output that looks like this:
[tt]
5 1 1,
11 0 0 1 1 0
12 <WATTS=100> <POWER=ON> <LEVEL=100> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
15 <WATTS=30> <POWER=ON> <LEVEL=30> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
16 FAILED 0 0 3 Waiting 1 1
17 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
18 <WATTS=39> <POWER=ON> <LEVEL=39> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
19 FAILED 0 0 5 Aborted: Unable to get any information on node 1 0
20 <WATTS=40> <POWER=ON> <LEVEL=40> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
21 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
22 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
23 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
24 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
25 <WATTS=0> <POWER=OFF> <LEVEL=0> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
26 0 0 3 Waiting 1 1
27 <WATTS=50> <POWER=ON> <LEVEL=50> 1 0 4 Successful: Node already configured 1 0
28 0 0 2 Queued 1 1
29 0 0 2 Queued 1 1
30 0 0 2 Queued 1 1
31 0 0 2 Queued 1 1
32 0 0 2 Queued 1 1 [/tt]
I think it would be great if the lines could begin with the node/device names. Presumably whatever generates the status response has access to this info, and having it in the response would make the list easier to read - and more importantly easier to use if you are parsing the results.
Thanks for reading,
David