I understand that after the last step (respond with status), the user feedback should start again. However, I think there is a practical disconnect there.
A couple of examples from my side:
Nucal / Netatmo integration has not been working (I think ever). See thread Updates for EZLogic - 1.44.1 (Ezlo Hubs only) - #8 by osman. Osman responded on the issue more than a year ago. The situation has not changed, integration is still not possible to setup. Hoever, it ends without proper response to the user.
FGD-212 integration, 1. ECS-1165. The issue is one year old without updated. I’ve ran into actual issues with the integration, where I had unwanted meshbots run on a daily basis, for about 2 months recently. That issue is gone, however the requested scene control functionality is still missing. Again, it ends without proper response to the user with the status.
InstaVue not being instant, see https://community.ezlo.com/t/instavue-far-from-instant/220968/2. Again, ezlo responds with working on this, but there has been no update for about 5 months on this. Meanwhile, the doorbel camera is just useless, no way I can get any live video before anyone at the door has already walked away. Again, there has been no feedback with a status update and it’s still broken.
Vistacam stopped recording, see https://community.ezlo.com/t/beta-vistacam-stopped-recording/220326. I reported this over a year ago, there has been no feedback with a status update and it’s still broken.
Within your support processes, there must be something missing to conclude these issues. It would help to get some response, something like:
- ‘We are aware, but we won’t fix this’
- ‘We’re working on it and we’ll update the status bi-weekly’
- ‘We think it’s fixed, can you check the result and provide feedback before we close the issue?’
I’m not really complaining here, I’ve been an Ezlo hub and Vistacam 1203 beta user, got the devices for free as part of that deal, so I’m in it to learn, provide feedback and hopefully end up with a powerful solution.