What Does the Repair Report Mean?

Hi–

Couldn’t find a post or reference on the wiki that explains the fields in the repair report (especially the part that refers to edge nodes). Part of my report shows:

Node: 2
Edge node: 0 score: 48 route: 1->0.0.0.0->2 num hops: 0 Latency avg: 1189 max: 1196 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 3 score: 157 route: 1->3.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1223 max: 7356 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 4 score: 55 route: 1->4.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1222 max: 1253 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 5 score: 182 route: 1->5.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1247 max: 8816 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 8 score: 55 route: 1->8.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1219 max: 1223 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 9 score: 75 route: 1->9.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1218 max: 2431 success 10 of 10
Edge node: 11 score: 95 route: 1->11.0.0.0->2 num hops: 1 Latency avg: 1223 max: 1253 success 8 of 10

I understand the latency times (avg and max) and the number of hops, but much of the other fields are a mystery… Know there is useful information here if only I can decipher it. Know the score is meaningful but is higher or lower better… 1->4.0.0.0->2 is another mystery…

I hoping someone can help?

   Don

“1->0.0.0.0->2”
The first number is Vera Node 1 ->0(no hops)-> etc. to node 2 so this is a direct connect no hops.

“1->3.0.0.0->2” is Vera using node 3 to get to node 2.

“1->11.0.0.0->2” is Vera using node 11 to get to node 2.

Vera will use a direct route to node 2 as it has the lowest score / latency.

JOD.

JOD –

Many thanks for the information. How is success measured. Is it binary can/can not communicate? I guess a lower score is better? I also assume node 1 is vera?

   Don