Anyone with experience on Vera 3 performance - especially 'Server busy'?

When adding devices to my Vera 2 or modifying any of the settings I am always surprised how the box can spend such a huge amount of time (10 to 20 seconds) with the ‘Server busy’ waiting message. I cannot believe it is so difficult to write a new device name in a database that it would take so much time.

I sincerely hope this much better on the Vera 3. Anyone with experience on waiting times on Vera 3 compared to Vera 2? Thanks for letting us know.

If it is much better I will buy one immediately.

it’s not writing into a database. Every time you add a device, it requires a luup restart, which takes 10-20 seconds. open an ssh session and tail -f /var/log/cmh/LuaUPnP.log to see what’s happening.

Even so, if it is about restarting Luup, is there anyone with any information about the vera 3 restarting much faster than the 20 seconds that are needed on the vera 2?

Btw: You mean it also requires a restart of the luup if the device name is updated?

Any changes to anything that requires a Save causes a restart of Luup.

Looks like it takes about 5-6 seconds for me until the “server busy” message disappears, on a restart. But it will surely depend on how many devices you have, how many plugins, how long each one takes to reload and initialize etc.

As far as I know, every time you change anything - the name of a room, the name of a device - that means the userdata file gets rewritten and LuaUPnP gets a restart. That means there doesn’t have to be a mechanism to dynamically change the internal data, you just rewrite the file and restart. Just guessing.