1.0.988 stability issues.

Community Playground General Discussions
21

[quote=“P00r, post:20, topic:165714”]The beta 989 solved all the sensor issue I had

http://download.findvera.com/betafirmware/ftp/wl500gP_Luup_ui2-1.0.989-1.trx

I think that this company has a great product with great potential, Vera is a fairly cheap product compared to other option (if you take into account the hardware they sell Vera at a very aggressive price!)

so for now I am happy and I will stick with the firmware I have that work for me and go back as needed if newer version get buggy!

I personally dislike the UI3 since it doesn’t offer some kind of dashboard and I hope that having 2 UI like this will be manageable, if not I will again be happy with what I already have in UI2…[/quote]

Thanks for the info. I have been facing unstable door sensor problem with 1.0.988 and it’s now solved in 1.0.989. :slight_smile: Been spending the last two days trying to find out what is the problem.

I also notice that there is also a 1.0.991 beta firmware. Does anyone know what is the fix for?

MCV do you have a readme file for each beta release. That’ll be very help!

22

Yuppidooo!
I just ugraded to 989 and my already 10 times deleted GC100 device was discovered again.
This cannot be that hard to reproduce!

Umtauscher

23

Umtauscher, I’m not sure why Ovidiu said the problem with the gc-100 re-installing is not reproducible. We don’t have a ‘blacklist’ mechanism in our plug and play scripts to stop them from auto-installing devices discovered on the network. I just created a bug report to implement this; http://bugs.micasaverde.com/view.php?id=983

In the meantime, if you put an exit at the top of /usr/bin/cmh_Pnp that will stop the plug and play mechanism from auto-installing ip devices when they request their ip address.

24

Thanks for the answer micasaverde,

but my GC has a fixed ip-address and Vera doesn’t pose as dhcp server either. So it must some be other mechanism that works here - at least not requesting an ip-address.

Will the change you proposed fix the problem anyway?
Thanks

Umtauscher

25

I followed your advice and it seems all my lags are gone. So could it be that cmh_PnP is causing this trouble?
I would be happy if anyone else with performance problems could try this as well and report back. Thanks

Umtauscher

26

what exactly did you do… I need more info

27

I followed the description of Micasaverde in the above post and placed an exit command at the beginning of the cmh_PnP file.
If you are not familiar with linux, I don’t recommend following that path and wait for an update of the firmware.

Cheers

Umtauscher

28

Thank you Umtauscher

I’m still a bit green with everything linux.